HMRC issues reminder about early December pay dates
Many businesses pay their employees early in December. However, for employees who also claim Universal Credit, this can cause a problem. HMRC has explained how to avoid it. What should you do?
In its latest employer bulletin, HMRC issued a reminder to employers that pay their employees earlier than usual in December. Employees who are in receipt of Universal Credit can be adversely affected if the correct reporting procedure is not followed, as the system for reporting income may include two payments for a single assessment period. As Universal Credit entitlement is assessed on an ongoing basis, this can reduce or even remove their entitlement altogether, causing hardship. Additionally, the reporting of zero earnings in the subsequent assessment period can mean that entitlement to the work allowance is lost in that period.
HMRC says that in order to avoid the issue, the employer should always use the regular contractual pay date in the full payment submission (FPS) - even if the pay date is earlier or later than usual. So, for December a business that usually pays employees on the last working day of the month should use 31 December on the FPS. Doing this will ensure the problem of double counting is avoided.
Related Topics
-
Unused sales suppression tools can still trigger penalties
HMRC has published a new compliance factsheet explaining the penalties that can apply where a business possesses an electronic sales suppression (ESS) tool, even if it has never actually been used to suppress a sale. What do you need to know?
-
Accounting for VAT if there is no cash payment
Your business has submitted repayment returns for the last two quarters and you are concerned that you might have underpaid output tax on some supplies where no money has changed hands. Are your concerns justified?
-
Treatment of distributions under review
The government has launched a consultation on modernising the tax treatment of distributions and repayments of capital by companies. The proposals could affect the distinction between dividends taxed as income and capital payments subject to CGT. What changes are being considered?