HMRC changes policy on time-to-pay arrangements
The loan charge in respect of historic use of "disguised remuneration" schemes is one of the most controversial enforcement policies in existence. If you owe money under the rules, why might a quiet change in policy relating to repayment arrangements?
If you owe tax in respect of disguised remuneration settlements and the loan charge, you’ll want to know about HMRC’s recent change of policy on time-to-pay arrangements . These tax debts automatically qualified for a time-to-pay arrangement over five years if your earnings were less than £50,000 per year or, where the loan charge applies, seven years if you earned less than £30,000.
HMRC will now use your most recent complete tax-year information available to determine if you’re eligible for the automatic time-to-pay deals and generally for other personal tax debts. The new criteria will apply to future time-to-pay arrangements but will not affect those which already exist.
Although the automatic time-to-pay deals don’t apply to those whose earnings exceed than £50,000 per year, HMRC says that it will consider flexible payment plans that can be amended over time to take account of changes in your circumstances.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?