Government to close business rates loophole
Many second home owners use a loophole to avoid council tax on the property. However, the government has announced that new rules will apply to prevent abuse from April next year. What’s going on?
Under the current system, owners of second properties in England can avoid a council tax bill if there is an intention to let the property to holiday makers. This brings the property into the business rates regime and, as a result, small businesses rates relief can be claimed. The problem is that many second home owners are declaring an intention to let their property, when in reality they just remain empty for most of the time.
From April 2023, the rules will change so that only genuine holiday lettings will qualify for the relief, bringing non-qualifying properties back into the charge to council tax. A property will only be assessed under the business rates regime if the owner can provide evidence that:
- it will be available for letting commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling at least 140 days in the coming year;
- during the previous year, it was available for letting commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling at least 140 days; and
- during the previous year, it was actually let commercially, as self-catering accommodation, for short periods totalling at least 70 days.
Related Topics
-
MTD glitch risks confusion over 2025/26 payments on account
Some taxpayers testing Making Tax Digital for Income Tax (MTD IT) are seeing confusing and incomplete payment information because their data is split between HMRC’s digital and self assessment systems. What’s happened?
-
Directors’ fees - can you escape PAYE?
You’ve been asked to join the board of a company in a purely advisory role. For tax and NI efficiency you want your fees to be paid to your own company. Does this arrangement fall foul of HMRC’s off-payroll rules?
-
MONTHLY FOCUS: AUTO-ENROLMENT - EMPLOYERS' RESPONSIBILITIES
What are an employer's responsibilities with regard to pension schemes and their employees?